89 (SD = dos.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), both organizations differing ranging from six months and you can 11 several years of relationship; 7.76 (SD = cuatro.01), anywhere between two and you may 19 many years; and you will (SD = 4.82), anywhere between less than annually and 31 many years. 8%) and you can lived having family unit members, if you’re those individuals living with the partners were mainly functioning some one (69.2%), where 53% had college or university or postgraduate degrees. Of formal union people, 67% got school otherwise post-scholar values, of which 89.8% was in fact functioning, 2% retired and 8.2% out of work. The functional problem into the hitched users try similar: 89.5% was basically functioning, dos.9% were resigned and you will six.3% was underemployed, and you can step 1.3% introduced other a career standing. Within category, 62.5% of your own users had college or university or postgraduate values.
Relationship Top quality, chosen to verify standards authenticity, was mentioned for the Relationship Score Mode–Changed (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt
The info showed are collected inside perspective off bigger search ideas, and this contained a detailed sociodemographic and you can matchmaking analysis, as well as other balances for the scope off close relationship.
Private connection is examined with respect to the Portuguese version (Desk step one) of the shorter sorts of brand new Dedication Measure (Stanley, 1986), that was interpreted with respect to the following the interpretation and retroversion procedures: after permission gotten by copywriter, the original measure is interpreted by several specialists in industry, both these translations was in fact exposed to retroversion by a few experts, one to bilingual plus one experienced in employing the newest English language; finally, for each type are as compared to brand-new level, going for the utilization of brand new terminology and you will affairs which have higher distance to it. The brand new Portuguese adaptation ergo contained the brand new 14 brand spanking new affairs and you may a comparable address measure and you will is named, immediately following deliberation because of the cluster, the personal Partnership Scale (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Into finally stage of your own translation procedure, the fresh new device is applied to three people on purpose of guaranteeing the fresh adequateness of vocabulary and also the unambiguous understanding of things, that have been chatted about to the participants once applying of the questionnaire. Because there was basically zero statements claiming otherwise, the things remained the same.
With respect to the overall lifetime of the relationship, the common, in years, for the more statuses described try, respectively: 2
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to bookofmatches mobile site excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.